AllUnity: Why a regulated euro stablecoin is built for cross-border payments

Most stablecoin attention has followed the US dollar, and most euro stablecoin commentary starts by asking whether a euro version is needed at all. Alexander Hoptner, CEO of AllUnity, starts somewhere else. His interest is not the crypto trading desk where dollar stablecoins already dominate. It is the multinational corporate moving money between the European Union and the rest of the world, where a payment can still take days and pass through several intermediaries.

Hoptner joined Paula Pettit, VP of Strategy and Growth at Range, to explain how AllUnity built EURAU around that use case. AllUnity is an e-money institution licensed by BaFin in Germany, backed by DWS, Galaxy and Flow Traders, and it launched its euro stablecoin in July of last year. Hoptner brings a long markets career to it, including two years running BitMEX, and he is blunt that the regulatory framework, not the technology, is what finally made the idea workable.

Range's view sits alongside that product story. A company that adopts a payment stablecoin still has to define its requirements, translate them into transaction and treasury controls, orchestrate the compliance and risk providers it already uses, then run monitoring, reconciliation and reporting as volume grows. A stablecoin can make cross-border value move in minutes, but it does not remove the need for an accountable operating model around the money.

Cross-border payments are the market, not crypto trading

Hoptner is precise about the segment AllUnity is chasing. General-purpose stablecoins earned their volume on crypto exchanges and in moving assets between them. His target is the real economy: multinational corporates with production, suppliers, subsidiaries and customers spread across countries, and the payments that flow between them. Domestic transfers are not the point. "It's from the European Union to the outside of the European Union and the other way around, and that's our clear focus."

The pain there is concrete and it is about time and cost. Between some jurisdictions a cross-border payment settles in minutes, between others it takes four to seven days, and every intermediary adds delay and risk. Hoptner argues the efficiency is a rare case where both sides gain: the sender can hold the money longer, the receiver gets it sooner and with less risk in transit. He runs the same logic through automotive supply chains, tourism, energy and even NGO disbursements.

Getting there is not simply a matter of issuing a token. Large corporates keep long-standing banking relationships and will not abandon them, so banks have to offer custody or wallets before their clients can receive a stablecoin. Companies want to send and receive in their own local currency, not manage foreign exchange, so the asset has to be convertible. And the receiving party has to be able to turn the stablecoin back into money, because most of the world does not yet accept it. As Hoptner puts it, "building an ecosystem where I can on and off ramp and do the FX conversion of the stablecoin, that's what needs to be built."

For teams using Range, that ecosystem is also where the operating surface expands. Range recommends a common transaction model across every new chain, wallet, banking partner and off-ramp, with clear ownership of balances and a repeatable reconciliation process, so a treasury team is not reconstructing a cross-border payment from bank statements and block explorers after the fact.

The euro stablecoin case does not rest on crypto

The standard objection is that nobody needs a euro stablecoin. Hoptner meets it head on: taken to its conclusion, the objection is really an argument about the currency itself. "If nobody needs a stablecoin, then your message is nobody needs the euro." He concedes the point where the critics are strongest, in crypto trading, where the euro's relevance is small and dollar assets carry the flow. That is not the market he is building for.

Weigh the euro by its role in real-economy payments and the picture inverts. It is the world's second largest reserve currency, and a large volume of value moves between the European Union and the outside world every day across existing rails. Hoptner's question is why that flow should not capture the efficiencies of tokenization. "Nobody wants to send euro," he notes, meaning a US company wants to send dollars and a European company euros, which is why a regulated euro token has a place next to a dollar one rather than in competition with it.

He does not expect a proliferation of tokens to last. Maintaining a stablecoin means maintaining APIs, relationships and a regulatory framework for each one, and Hoptner argues "most players will not onboard to hundreds of various different stablecoins." He expects the market to converge on a small number of dominant assets per currency, much as the dollar market has.

A conservative reserve and an e-money wrapper

AllUnity's design choices follow from the payments focus. The asset is chain-agnostic and, in Hoptner's framing, use-case agnostic. Onboarding is deliberately mundane: a client gets whitelisted, sends money to a reserve bank account, and the tokens are created into their wallet automatically. Redemption reverses it. "It's like a swapping booth," he says, with no discretionary interaction and the reserve held insolvency-remote.

On the reserve itself, Hoptner is conservative by design: "we go super conservative, 100% cash on a reserve bank account in the European Union," he says, audited monthly and viewable in real time. His reasoning is about confidence at the starting point: "the euro is a euro is a euro," not an instrument whose market price a holder has to think about. "Trust is key," and a fully cash-backed reserve is how he intends to earn it before adding complexity.

The legal wrapper matters as much as the reserve. Europe placed its stablecoin regime under the existing e-money license rather than creating a dedicated one, which means the token is treated as e-money, and e-money denominated in euro is euro. "It's not crypto. It's not a crypto asset," Hoptner says, and that classification carries through to how a company processes and accounts for it. He notes MiCA does not fix the fiat currency, so under the same license AllUnity could list compliant stablecoins in other currencies through European banks that clear dollars.

Range's view is that the e-money classification simplifies accounting but does not remove the operating work. Range recommends matching treasury controls to the new payment surface before volume arrives, from approval policies and counterparty records to sanctions checks, transaction limits and escalation paths, tested against a mint, a redemption and a month-end close before a corporate counterparty depends on them.

Comparable rules are what make cross-border settlement work

Regulation is not a backdrop to AllUnity's plan, it is a precondition. Hoptner reads the double-spending problem in the original bitcoin white paper as the reason so much of traditional finance is institutionalized, and the arrival of a real framework as the moment the payments idea became mass-market viable. On MiCA specifically he is enthusiastic without being uncritical: "MiCA is fantastic. Is it perfect? Naturally not." He credits it as a fast, workable starting point other regimes now use as a blueprint.

What makes that convergence useful is interoperability between regimes. Hoptner points out that MiCA, the US framework and regimes in Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan already share fundamentals, differing mainly on the reserve side, such as which instruments an issuer may hold and for how long. He notes a common rule that issuers cannot pay interest out of the yield generated on reserves. That similarity is not incidental to his business: "cross border payments only work if the regulatory framework on the receiving end is at least comparable or similar to the one of the sending end."

Sitting under BaFin has a particular advantage in his telling. "BaFin is maybe not always a very easy regulator," he says, but once a firm has its acceptance, other regulators are unlikely to raise fresh objections. The strictness at the front end buys credibility everywhere else.

Range's read is that comparable rules across jurisdictions raise the bar on evidence rather than lower it. Range recommends that firms operating across regimes keep one control record that can satisfy the strictest regulator in the chain, covering approvals, counterparties, reserve movements and reporting, so a payment crossing from one framework into another stays clean.

Fragmentation is the risk as every bank issues its own coin

The threat Hoptner worries about is not too few stablecoins but too many. He sketches the scenario where every bank issues its own token because it looks like a way to keep clients. Play it through, he says, and a multinational making a single payment across several banking relationships ends up having to cross several stablecoins at once. Each may be reserved slightly differently, with a different cash portion and issuing bank and therefore a different rating. The result is that "to just make one payment, I need to cross several stablecoins," and the payment becomes more complex and costly than the one it replaced.

His expectation is that the market has to converge for exactly this reason. A large corporate building a token into its systems will not want to depend on a single provider either, so he sees a stable end state of two or perhaps three dominant assets per currency, enough for a fallback without the sprawl. He is candid that adoption is early and much of the near-term work is plumbing, but his own vision is that people should not have to think about any of it: "the people on the street, they just wanna pay," and in an ideal world, "we won't talk about this topic in five years at all."

For Range, that fragmentation is the strongest argument for an operating layer that does not assume a single asset or provider. Range recommends a model that treats every token, chain, wallet and counterparty through one consistent record, so that when a payment does cross several stablecoins with different reserves and ratings, a finance team can still reconcile it and answer for it.

Bringing stablecoins into your stack

The through-line of the conversation is that a payment stablecoin succeeds or fails on what surrounds it. AllUnity has picked a clear market, a conservative reserve and a regulated wrapper, and Hoptner is the first to say the ecosystem of banks, off-ramps and FX still has to be built. As it grows, one euro of value can arrive as several tokens across several chains, banks and reserves, and someone has to hold, reconcile and answer for all of it. That operating layer, one view of every token, chain, wallet and counterparty, with the controls, reconciliation and reporting finance and compliance need, is what Range builds for companies working across stablecoins and fiat.

If you are adding stablecoins to your stack, or trying to bring an existing deployment under control, talk to us: See how Range supports stablecoin operations

About AllUnity

AllUnity is a German e-money institution, a joint venture of DWS, Galaxy and Flow Traders, that issues EURAU, a fully reserved euro stablecoin. EURAU is issued under a BaFin e-money license and aligned with the EU's MiCA framework, backed by cash reserves held in the European Union with regular proof-of-reserves reporting. The token is built for regulated, instant cross-border euro payments for financial institutions, fintechs and corporates. Learn more at allunity.com.

Want to appear on Range Stablecoin Fireside? If you are building with stablecoins and want a seat on the show, get in touch by email or on X.